Are kids Really Resilient?
Recently it was brought to my attention that the Idaho
Department of Health and Welfare is currently telling foster parents that the
research (from Dr. Bruce Perry one of the leading experts on trauma- senior
fellow of the Child Trauma Academy) shows that kids are resilient and that
separating children from an established care-giver does not have the effect on
them we once thought it did. As a
counselor who works in the field of adoption and with challenging children, my
experience tells me otherwise. I often
hear adults say that kids will “get over it” (a death, a move, a loss, abuse or
other traumatic events that would completely undo most adults). As Dr. Bruce Perry puts it, “of course they
get over it, they have no choice!” But
Perry continues by affirming that during the course of “getting over it” the
child loses a piece of themselves- the fundamentals of their true emotional,
behavioral, cognitive and social potential are weakened (Perry, 2013). With so much research and information about
the brain and how children are impacted by change, trauma, and lack of secure
attachments, why, oh why, are we still holding onto the lore that kids will be
fine no matter what happens to them? I would like to discredit the myth that
all children are naturally resilient. It is my hope that we will learn how we
can build stronger and more resilient kids able to overcome adversity and
distress.
Since my state’s child welfare system used Dr. Bruce Perry to
justify their position, this essay will look at what Dr. Perry and other
leaders in the field of trauma and attachment have to say about resilience and
attachment. According to Dr. Perry, “persistence in the destructive myth that
‘children are resilient’ will prevent millions of children, and our society,
from meeting their true potential. It need not be so.” (Perry, 2013). Dr. Perry also says that resilient children
are not born, they are made. He further states in numerous articles found at
www. childtrauma.org, that children are not really resilient, they are moldable-for
better or for worse. What I found is that children are at times what we might
call resilient, but rarely is it by happen chance. Perry teaches four key
factors that affect a child’s ability to be resilient.
The first factor according to Dr. Perry, is temperament.
Some children are born with a higher tolerance level to stress and adversity.
As infants and in early childhood, these children are usually easy to comfort
and feel secure. Not all children are
this way, some are very sensitive to any distress internally or environmentally
and they are not easy to calm. Perry
also notes that research is showing that the ability to overcome stress has a
great deal to do with the mother’s level of stress, anxiety and distress during
pregnancy (Perry, 2006). The stress hormones are passed to the child in the womb.
Research shows that mother’s with a stable life, good nutrition, with no
alcohol or drugs during pregnancy have children with easier to sooth
personalities.
Secondly, Perry proves that no matter what the temperament
of the child is, the ability to deal with stressors is molded by the child’s
caregivers. A calm, experienced caregiver can create what Dr. Karyn Purvis
calls “felt safety” for the child (Purvis, 2013). It is also true that an
anxious, inexperienced and isolated caregiver can cause more issues, create
more sensitivities, and mold a child less capable of dealing with stress. Dr. Perry emphasizes that the fit between the
caregiver and the child plays an important role in developing resilience (Perry,
2006).
Healthy Attachments are the third factor in building
resilience in children. Dr. Perry says that kids with poor bonding, and
children who are isolated with limited or disrupted social and emotional
connections are very susceptible to distress (Perry, 2006). These children
often carry with them symptoms such as impulsivity, aggression, inattention and
depression. Perry and attachment theory specialists all agree that connection
with others and a child’s ability to relate to other people is a strength that progresses
in the early years of life within the caregiver-child interaction.
The last factor in building resilience is that children need
opportunities to practice building their stress response systems through
gradual exposure to challenges in motor, social, emotional and cognitive areas.
The slow but sure learning of new skills, while feeling safe, gives a child
experience in building confidence and over time, resilience (Perry, 2006). In a
loving and nurturing home environment and within a safe and caring community,
children are able to fail, succeed and overcome difficulties (Purvis, 2013).
This helps them to overcome greater difficulties and to take risks needed to
succeed.
“Adults interpret the actions, words and
expressions of children through the distorted filter of their own beliefs. In
the lives of most infants and children, these common adult misinterpretations
are relatively benign. In many cases, however, these misinterpretations can be
destructive. The most dramatic example occurs when the impact of traumatic
events on infants and young children is minimized. It is an ultimate irony that
at the time when the human is most vulnerable to the effects of trauma-during
infancy and childhood-adults generally presume the most resilience.” (Perry,
2013).
Over and over through researching attachment, trauma and
resilience, I have found the family, whether it is foster, adoptive or
biological, to be the essential support for the child and the greatest healing
agent. It really does matter, when faced with adversity, trauma or
difficulties, what our relational capabilities are. The sudden death, the
abrupt move, and an unexpected separation may all ruin present emotional
connection, often producing fear and intense emotional pain (Perry, 2006). As
adults wemay know to reach out for help from those close to us to make sense of
what is happening when faced with tough situations. In our struggle we may
cling to what is familiar and look for help to make it through. For most
children, loss and fear go hand in hand (Perry, 2010 and Purvis, 2013). Children do not know what will happen to them
next or how to process loss, grief and they are afraid. Other emotions
intensify when fear is at the core. Children
with fear responses often struggle to concentrate in school, they typically
misread and misunderstand social cues, and can be immature socially and
behaviorally.
I couldn’t agree with Dr. Perry more when he says that as a
society we need greater understanding that unpredictable, inconsistent, abusive
or neglectful caregiving in early childhood changes the normal development of
neural systems involved in both relationships and the stress response (Perry,
2010). This understanding needs to affect our policies and practices as well as
our parenting. Research proves over and over it is through patterned, repetitive
neural stimulations provided by consistent, nurturing, predictable, responsive
caregivers that the brain gets what is needed to produce the capacity for
healthy attachments and self-regulation (Perry, 2010). Over and over the
findings are showing relationships in childhood can change the vulnerability-resilience
stability for the child. Understanding
healthy social and emotional development in children emphasizes why disruptions
and disorganized attachment has far reaching repercussions.
Dr. Perry defines attachment as a continuing relationship
with a specific person that is characterized by soothing, comfort, pleasure and
safety (Perry, 2013). Clearly we must see there is power in relationships to rebuild
or to damage children. Healthy interactions, emotional connections and
nurturing caregivers offer a strong basis for surviving. Children who have experienced
loss in attachments, seldom feel safe when placed in new healthy caregiving
situations. They often work to circumvent close relationships. They don’t form
secure attachments easily. Caregivers who provide a safe and healthy
relationship to children impacted by multiple moves, and early trauma must
understand and know how to establish predictable routines, create connections,
be attuned, attentive and committed and provide solid therapeutic treatment in
order for children to heal (Purvis, 2005).
Unfortunately, our existing mental health, child welfare and
judicial systems as well as child placing agencies seem to be unaware of these
essential finding in development, attachment and trauma (Perry, 2010). Children
are moved from therapist to therapist, school to school, foster home to foster
home, community to community. Our systems often intensify or even repeat the
relational impermanence and trauma in a child’s life (Perry, 2010). It is presumed
therapy or healing will take place in the child through superficial relational
interactions with poorly nurturing strangers. And at great cost to our children
our systems rate far too low the powerful therapeutic impact of a caring foster
parent, a teacher, a coach, a neighbor or many other would-be healers.
After looking through article after article on development
of attachments and creating resilience in children I want to make clear from
the findings that resilience is predominantly fostered by the strength of a
child’s connection to his core groups. The importance of attachment has been
widely studied and it is time practices and policies catch up with research. The
fitness of the parents or caregivers is the most substantial variable in the
child’s well-being and we must give it equal merit in our decisions when
placing children. Probably the most
important lesson is when children begin to feel safe, they become free to heal,
learn and grow. This sense of security should not be taken lightly when making
decisions about a child’s resiliency or ability to attach.
References:
Perry (2006) Resilience: Where Does it Come From? Found on
Scholastic.com
Perry, B.D. & Ludy-Dobson, Christine R., (2010). Working
with Children to Heal Interpersonal Trauma: The Power of play. Edited by Eliana
Gil)
Perry B.D. (2013) “Children are not resilient, children are
malleable”. Excerpts from Childhood
Trauma, the Neurobiology of Adaptation, and ‘Use-dependent’ Development of the
Brain: How ‘States’ Become ‘Traits’.
Purvis, Karyn, Phd & Cross, David, PhD (April 2013).
From Fostering Families Today.
For more information go to www.childTraumaAcademy.org and www.postinstitute.com or www.empoweredtoconnect.com